Muddy High Heels

How do you get into "burningoldsneakers" group in yahoo...I searched it and did not find it

Bandolinohaze wrote:How do you get into "burningoldsneakers" group in yahoo...I searched it and did not find it

link:

http://fr.groups.yahoo.com/group/burnin ... =365447256

that help bud?

It still seems quite of a bullshit to me.
Here you state that these are your daughter's, there "you" state they are "your".
Prove yourself that these are your photos of your daughters shoes. Make a photo of her shoe collection with a so-called "timestamp" -just a simple date and "sneakersfun" written on a small piece of paper near the collection. That should make the things clear.

Hi all i'm also a member of that yahoo group and i reckon those pics have been up for just under a year.
I'm not saying that they are not his but that would mean it's taken nearly a year for them to find their way on here plus anyone can save those pics so thousands of people could lay claim to them.
Not sure but i don't think there is any mention of "my daughter" in or around those pics on the group...i may be wrong.

fetishforlife wrote:Hi all i'm also a member of that yahoo group and i reckon those pics have been up for just under a year.
I'm not saying that they are not his but that would mean it's taken nearly a year for them to find their way on here plus anyone can save those pics so thousands of people could lay claim to them.
Not sure but i don't think there is any mention of "my daughter" in or around those pics on the group...i may be wrong.

There is clearly something fishy..here..I joined the yahoo group and second this post.'sneakerfun' has had awile since these pics posted to hijack..he doent mention 'his daughter' in the group..i'm not saying..I'm just saying...

THESE PICS ARE MINE!! I took 34 photos and i posted to 27 photos Burningoldsneakersgroup. This pair of converse is a pair of female shoes !
Her size is 7 1/2 and she loves converse shoes...

Why not show the complete set then - including the hitherto not shown ones? Would probably end this unfruitful discussion and divert it to the real thing